Author
Listed:
- S S Chaity
- M R Islam
- M Faruquee
- J U Ahmed
- A K M Aminul Islam
Abstract
For a rice breeding program to produce the desired genotypes, parental selection is the most important factor. To select elite parental materials, this study evaluated 200 International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) developed advanced breeding lines during 2022 Wet Season (WS-T. Aman) and 2023 Dry Season (DS-Boro) along with two sets of check (10 global and 6 different local for each season) using an alpha lattice design with two replications in the research field of Gazipur Agricultural University, Gazipur-1706. Among the breeding lines, significant genetic variation was found and according to heritability and genetic advance analysis, additive gene action controls plant height (PH), panicle length (PL), spikelet fertility (SF), thousand grain weight (TGW), and grain yield (t/ha) (GYTH). Correlation coefficients revealed that in both season yield has a positive relationship with panicle length (0.20**, 0.35***), spikelet fertility (0.19**, 0.23***), days to maturity (DTM) (0.37***, 0.24***), and days to 50% flowering (DFF) (0.34***, 0.29***). In this study, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed 4 & 3 PCs in 2022WS and 2023DS contributing to 66.90% & 61.90% of total variability with eigenvalues>1. The Multi-Trait Genotype–Ideotype Distance Index (MGIDI) analysis results a total genetic gain of 28.51% & 25.86% in 2022WS & 2023DS and identified IR19A8066, IR19A8052, IR19A7440, IR19A9061, and IR19A9054 genotypes as valuable resources for developing recombinant populations, aligning with sustainable and effective crop improvement strategies. For parental selection, IR19A8054, IR19A8052, IR19A7501, IR19A8047, IR19A8066, IR19A7531, IR19A7523, IR19A7541, IR19A7510 with Genomic Estimated Breeding Value (GEBV)>0.50 for yield are preferred. The maximum yield (5.34 t/ha) in 2022WS was generated by check RABI dhan1, while 5.12 t/ha was produced by IR19A7664, and more than 4.50 t/ha was produced by IR19A9054, IR19A7408, and IR19A7440. When compared to check BRRI dhan89 (7.97 t/ha), IR19A7339 delivered the highest in 2023DS (8.67 t/ha), followed by IR19A7510, IR19A7523, IR19A8047, and IR19A8066 (>8 t/ha). With positive GEBVs of 0.19, 0.32, and 0.62, respectively, IR19A9054, IR19A9212, and IR19A8066 demonstrated superior yield in both rice growing seasons.
Suggested Citation
S S Chaity & M R Islam & M Faruquee & J U Ahmed & A K M Aminul Islam, 2026.
"Identification of elite rice lines with better breeding values using genomic prediction and multi-trait genotype ideotype distance index (MGIDI) for grain yield under irrigation cropping system,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-24, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0340188
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340188
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.