IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0339992.html

Exploring barriers of household contact screening of index case contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis cases in Sekela district, Amhara region, Ethiopia: 2023; descriptive qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Mihrete Geremew
  • Zewudu Dagnaw
  • Eskezyiaw Agedew
  • Abiot Aschale
  • Aysheshim Asnake Abneh
  • Tadele Derbew Kassie

Abstract

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading global public health challenge, with about one-third of the world’s population infected and at risk of developing active disease during their lifetime.. Contact screening is crucial strategy for active case detection and to identify more cases. It involves systematic screening of the contacts of known TB patients. There is an ongoing need for research into barriers to contact investigation to better information uptake. Objective: Exploring the barriers to Household Contact screening of pulmonary Tuberculosis Cases. Materials and methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted at Sekela district, West Gojjam zone, Ethiopia. Purposive sampling (heterogenic) technique was used to recruit study participants. Fourteen participants were involved in the study in accordance with data saturation which includes health extension workers, PTB patients; household contacts of TB patients, health center TB focal and district TB officer. Data was collected through in-depth interviews using a semi-structured guide, transcribed word by word and conceptually translated. A thematic analysis was conducted after coding to answer specific study questions. Result: The main barriers for contact screening of PTB case explored were; health care system related barriers like not conducting review meeting power, lack of training, lack of supervision and follow up; barriers from the health care workers; work over load, non-commitment; socio economic barrier, discrimination, preference of traditional healers and culture, difficult geographic area; and barriers from patients and contacts are lack of awareness, low health seeking behavior. Conclusion: The overall explorations of this study identified multiple and interconnected barriers that range from individuals to health system levels which influence contact screening of pulmonary tuberculosis cases in the study area. Not paying attention to contact tracing activity by health system care system results lack of commitment of health care workers not giving health education to community.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihrete Geremew & Zewudu Dagnaw & Eskezyiaw Agedew & Abiot Aschale & Aysheshim Asnake Abneh & Tadele Derbew Kassie, 2025. "Exploring barriers of household contact screening of index case contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis cases in Sekela district, Amhara region, Ethiopia: 2023; descriptive qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339992
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339992
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339992&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0339992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.