Author
Listed:
- Yazgan Tunç
- Fatih Demirel
- Ali Khadivi
- Kadir Uğurtan Yılmaz
- Hüsnü Demirsoy
- Bilal Cemek
- Hatice Gözel
- Daya Shankar Mishra
Abstract
Estimating olive (Olea europaea L.) leaf area is an important aspect of monitoring plant health and evaluating growth processes in agriculture. Accurate estimation of leaf area allows for a better understanding of processes such as water and nutrient utilization, photosynthesis efficiency, respiration, and yield potential. This study aims to determine the most accurate, easy, and reliable leaf area estimation model using the geometric properties (length and width) of olive leaves. Additionally, the predictive performances of multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) were compared. A total of 1320 leaf samples collected from 22 olive cultivars were used in the study. Leaf length and width were taken as input parameters, and both MLR and ANN models were developed for each cultivar. Both multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models demonstrated high predictive accuracy for olive leaf area estimation across 22 cultivars. The MLR models explained up to 96% of the variation in leaf area using leaf length (LL) and leaf width (LW), with low root mean square errors, indicating strong reliability. When cultivar identity was modeled as a categorical factor through dummy encoding, the model captured significant cultivar-specific effects without altering the overall predictive performance. The ANN models achieved slightly higher accuracy, with determination coefficients exceeding 0.99 and minimal prediction errors, confirming their superior ability to model nonlinear relationships. Across both approaches, leaf width contributed more strongly to leaf area than leaf length. Cultivar-specific differences were statistically significant for only a few genotypes, while most cultivars exhibited comparable patterns after adjustment for multiple testing. In conclusion, both MLR and ANN models demonstrated high accuracy in predicting olive leaf area, with ANN models showing slightly superior performance. However, MLR models also yielded highly reliable results, indicating that both approaches are viable for practical applications in olive cultivation. These predictive models can be effectively used for rapid, non-destructive phenotyping, growth monitoring, and precision management in olive breeding and production systems.
Suggested Citation
Yazgan Tunç & Fatih Demirel & Ali Khadivi & Kadir Uğurtan Yılmaz & Hüsnü Demirsoy & Bilal Cemek & Hatice Gözel & Daya Shankar Mishra, 2026.
"Artificial intelligence-based modeling for accurate leaf area estimation in olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-21, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0339865
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339865
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.