IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0339668.html

Academic generational differences in Chinese universities: Work preferences, research behaviors and research outputs

Author

Listed:
  • Yangyang Cui
  • Hui Guo

Abstract

Utilizing data from the 2018 Survey of Academic Profession in the Knowledge Society in China, this study examines generational divergences in work preferences and research behaviors. It further analyzes how these factors relate to the research outputs. The findings indicate that the younger generation serves as the predominant force in research production, exhibiting pronounced research preferences, dedicating more time to research activities, collaborating less, and producing the highest volume of high-impact publications (HIPs). Conversely, the older generation acts as the ‘social service representative,’ devoting more time to social service, collaborating more extensively on research, and balancing teaching and research responsibilities. The middle generation demonstrates research behaviors exhibiting intermediate associations between the older and younger cohorts. International cooperation correlates with elevated HIPs across all generations, showing the strongest association in the older generation. Research time investment positively correlates with HIPs among the younger and middle generations, while research-oriented preferences exhibit associations with HIPs among the younger and older generations. Consequently, institutions should recalibrate evaluation systems by integrating senior academics’ expertise and fostering intergenerational networks that recognize diverse contributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yangyang Cui & Hui Guo, 2025. "Academic generational differences in Chinese universities: Work preferences, research behaviors and research outputs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339668
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339668
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339668&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0339668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.