Author
Listed:
- Lian Tang
- Yong Chen
- Shaoqing Zhan
- Longxun Zhu
- PanFeng Feng
Abstract
Background: The NCT04878016 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of socazolimab in combination with carboplatin/etoposide as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This study aims to analyze the cost-effectiveness of this combination regimen from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Method: A Markov model with three health states was constructed. The model simulated a time horizon of 10 years with a cycle length of 3 weeks. Costs and utilities were discounted at 5% annually. The primary outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Results: The base-case analysis showed that the ICER for the socazolimab group compared to the chemotherapy-alone group was 355,316.95 yuan/QALY, which exceeds three times China’s per capita GDP in 2024 as the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that PD utility, PFS utility, socazolimab cost, and neutropenia management cost had significant impacts on model results. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the probability of socazolimab combined with chemotherapy being cost-effective was 21.9%. Conclusion: At China’s WTP threshold, socazolimab combined with chemotherapy is not cost-effective versus chemotherapy alone for ES-SCLC.
Suggested Citation
Lian Tang & Yong Chen & Shaoqing Zhan & Longxun Zhu & PanFeng Feng, 2025.
"Socazolimab combined with carboplatin and etoposide as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis in China,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0339663
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339663
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.