IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0339381.html

SmUDo (Smart Unit-Dose): Redefining efficiency, quality, and staffing strategies for optimized processes

Author

Listed:
  • Jana Gerstmeier
  • Saskia Herrmann
  • Annika Demuth
  • Natalie Vuong
  • Olaf Kannt
  • Dominic Fenske

Abstract

Background: The implementation of unit-dose dispensing systems (UDDS) in hospital pharmacies represents a major milestone in the digital transformation of medication therapy management, operational efficiency, and improving patient safety. However, the absence of standardized metrics for workforce planning and cost assessment has limited widespread adoption. This gap makes it increasingly challenging for healthcare stakeholders to optimize the allocation of limited medical and financial resources. Methods: Using data from a 1,800-bed tertiary care hospital with 1,680 UDDS beds (2021–2024), this study establishes benchmarks for staffing requirements and associated costs. The following key performance metrics were analyzed: task-specific work times, unit-dose machine utilization, and productivity indicators such as blistered tablet output and blister bag production per full-time equivalent (FTE). Results: The findings indicate a staffing benchmark of 0.45 FTE per 100 UDDS-covered hospital beds to support both implementation and routine operations. Workforce efficiency improved significantly, with the number of FTEs per 1 million blistered tablets decreasing from 3.2 in 2021 to 1.7 in 2024. Concurrently, the cost per blister bag improved from €0.55 in 2021 to €0.22 in 2024, well within the optimal unit target price range of €0.20-€0.25; blistered tablet production tripled, rising from 1.5x106 to 4.7x106 between 2021 and 2024 respectively. A gold standard of 1 FTE per 10,000 cases was established to optimize staffing and operational workflows. The sharp decline in FTE per 1 million requirements from 5.45 to 2.29 underscores the pivotal role of experienced clinical pharmacists in ensuring safe, accurate, and resource-optimized prescription validation. Conclusion: The proposed benchmarks provide practical guidance for improving UDDS productivity, optimizing resource allocation, and strengthening workforce management. Our findings provide a framework that supports continuous UDDS improvement in hospital pharmacy operations and evidence-based decision-making for key stakeholders. By establishing clear UDDS benchmarks, this study supports cost-efficient UDDS operations while providing surrogate indicators of patient safety and clinical quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana Gerstmeier & Saskia Herrmann & Annika Demuth & Natalie Vuong & Olaf Kannt & Dominic Fenske, 2026. "SmUDo (Smart Unit-Dose): Redefining efficiency, quality, and staffing strategies for optimized processes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339381
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339381
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339381&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0339381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.