IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0339332.html

The socioeconomic impact of inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) in Belgium: A cost-of-illness study

Author

Listed:
  • Ine Vandersmissen
  • Janice Geers
  • Tom Denee
  • Salla Oinasmaa
  • Dagmar Hoeben
  • Xinyi Zhang
  • Burcak Aydin
  • Simone Cheung
  • Lorenzo Billiet
  • Inge Joniau
  • Avril Daly
  • Steven Simoens
  • Bart P Leroy

Abstract

Introduction: Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a diverse group of vision-threatening conditions caused by genetic mutations, affecting over 5.5 million people globally. These diseases have profound impact on patients, families and society. However, there is a lack of comprehensive data on their prevalence, economic burden, and societal costs. This information gap hinders effective decision-making, and the allocation of resources needed for research, treatment, and patient support, ultimately compromising care and outcomes. Objective: To quantify the societal burden of IRDs in Belgium in 2023 Methods: This cost-of-illness study estimated the total costs of the 11 most prevalent IRDs in Belgium. A survey of Belgian IRD patients collected primary data on disease burden, health resource utilization, productivity, and care-related expenses. Additionally, data on prevalence and health system costs were based on a literature review from PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Results: Patients reported a substantial impact on daily activities (96%), mental health (81%), and 78% reported having received genetic testing. IRDs impose a significant economic burden in Belgium, with an average annual cost of €37,228 per patient and a total cumulative burden of €129.4 million. Indirect non-healthcare costs represented the largest proportion (84%), followed by direct healthcare costs (12%), mainly from rehabilitation, and direct non-healthcare costs (4%). Indirect costs included significant productivity losses of €77.7 million and an informal care burden of €31.3 million. Government support programmes accounted for €4.9 million annually. Conclusion: This study highlights the substantial clinical and economic burden of IRDs on Belgian society. Therefore, it is important to continue investing in research and development, as well as to consider the substantial societal impact of these conditions in decision-making and shaping policy changes for Belgium. Future investments informed by these findings can contribute to decreasing the burden on society and enhance the well-being, inclusion and productivity of patients and caregivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ine Vandersmissen & Janice Geers & Tom Denee & Salla Oinasmaa & Dagmar Hoeben & Xinyi Zhang & Burcak Aydin & Simone Cheung & Lorenzo Billiet & Inge Joniau & Avril Daly & Steven Simoens & Bart P Leroy, 2026. "The socioeconomic impact of inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) in Belgium: A cost-of-illness study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339332
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339332
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339332&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0339332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.