IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0339295.html

A study on collaboration innovation: Perspectives of innovative ecosystems of value co-creation using evolutionary game theory

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaowei Shi
  • Jifa Wang

Abstract

Enhancing emphasis on value co-creation and optimizing resource allocation are crucial for fostering deep coupling and synergistic development within innovation ecosystems, thereby enhancing innovation efficacy. Within a bounded rationality framework, this study constructs an evolutionary game model of value co-creation behavior between core enterprises and participating firms in innovation ecosystems. Simulation analysis reveals the underlying evolutionary dynamics. Findings indicate that sufficient resource reserves, superior value creation capabilities, positive cognitive attitudes, effective incentive policies, and appropriate regulatory measures all facilitate high-quality value co-creation. Conversely, heightened uncertainty risks and substantial co-creation costs may impede value co-creation among innovation actors within the ecosystem. The results hold significant implications for optimizing value co-creation mechanisms and promoting the healthy development of innovation ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaowei Shi & Jifa Wang, 2026. "A study on collaboration innovation: Perspectives of innovative ecosystems of value co-creation using evolutionary game theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339295
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339295
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339295&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0339295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.