IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0339264.html

The decade of China’s football reform: Evolutionary characteristics, performance evaluation, and reflections and insights

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Li
  • Peng Du
  • Wanjin Deng
  • Dawei He
  • Xinyi Dong
  • Qifei Xia

Abstract

The year 2025 marks the tenth anniversary of the issuance of the General Plan of Chinese Football Reform and Development, and the deepening development of China’s football reform necessitates a robust policy framework for support. Quantitative research on policy texts enables an objective evaluation of the policy efficacy in China’s football reform. This study constructs a quantitative assessment and empirical analysis framework encompassing nine primary variables and 40 secondary variables by employing methods such as textual analysis, the Delphi method, content analysis, and the PMC index model. Combining the PMC index model with surface plots, it conducts a quantitative evaluation of ten representative national-level policy texts introduced by China. The results indicate that, the overall assessment of these ten policies is “good.” Among them, two policies (P1 and P3) are classified as exemplary policies, four (P4, P6, P7, and P8) are rated as good policies, and the remaining four are categorized as moderate policies. This suggests that while the policy design is generally scientifically sound and effective, there remains room for improvement in increasing the number of exemplary policies. The research conclusions suggest that exemplary policies exhibit characteristics of both localized top-level design and a leading-by-example effect; good policies encounter practical issues of coordinated policy design with localized deficiencies; and moderate policies still display governance phenomena of specialized institutional outputs coupled with mutual constraints. Therefore, the national strategy for China’s future football reform is characterized by longevity and gradualism, and there remains a lag in the implementation and actualization of policies. It is imperative to adopt a process-oriented mindset to achieve a substantive transformation from the advantages of policy texts to governance efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Li & Peng Du & Wanjin Deng & Dawei He & Xinyi Dong & Qifei Xia, 2025. "The decade of China’s football reform: Evolutionary characteristics, performance evaluation, and reflections and insights," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339264
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339264&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0339264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.