IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0339224.html

Analysis of the importance and priority of male and female players in mixed doubles table tennis

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Yang
  • Muzi Li

Abstract

To examine the relative importance and tactical priorities of male and female players in mixed doubles table tennis, this study analysed 35 matches involving world top-50 ranked players. A novel Five-Phase and Four-Mode Model was eveloped and applied. Performance was then evaluated using multiple regression and total decision coefficient method. The results indicate that: (1) Compared to conventional methods, the proposed model demonstrates superior alignment with mixed doubles characteristics in three key dimensions: phase segmentation, assessment indicators, and data acquisition protocols. This methodological advancement significantly enhances the characterization of doubles-specific technical and tactical patterns. (2) Male players demonstrated a higher performance impact (1.3 times that of female players), which is consistent with empirically observed “male-dominant, female-supportive” dynamic in mixed doubles. (3) The “lady-first” strategy is confirmed as an effective match arrangement principle: during service round, the female player should serve first; in receiving scenarios, regardless of the server’s identity, the female player should be the primary receiver.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Yang & Muzi Li, 2026. "Analysis of the importance and priority of male and female players in mixed doubles table tennis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339224
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339224
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339224&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0339224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.