Author
Listed:
- Amine Ben Safta
- Salsabil Nasri
- Imen Samaali
- Hajer Taher
- Mohamed Mehdi Trabelsi
- Chadli Dziri
- Wajih Dougaz
- Ramzi Nouira
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for treating symptomatic gallstone disease. Pneumoperitoneum is essential for adequate visualization during the procedure and is typically maintained at a standard pressure of 12–14 mmHg. However, high insufflation pressure may contribute to increased postoperative pain. This study aims to assess whether low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (8 mmHg) reduces postoperative pain compared to standard pressure (14 mmHg), without compromising operative safety or efficacy. We hypothesize that low pressure pneumoperitoneum at 8 mmHg reduces postoperative pain, without increasing operation time or postoperative morbidity. Methods: This is a single-center, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Consecutive Adult patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either low-pressure (8 mmHg) or standard-pressure (14 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum. The primary outcome is postoperative abdominal pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include VAS pain scores at 12 and 24 hours, postoperative nausea and/or vomiting, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative 30-day morbidity. The enrollment of patients will be done between November 12, 2024 to December 31, 2025. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06685250 Conclusion: If proven effective, low-pressure pneumoperitoneum may represent a simple strategy to improve postoperative comfort in laparoscopic cholecystectomy without compromising surgical outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Amine Ben Safta & Salsabil Nasri & Imen Samaali & Hajer Taher & Mohamed Mehdi Trabelsi & Chadli Dziri & Wajih Dougaz & Ramzi Nouira, 2025.
"Randomized controlled trial comparing low pressure (8 mmHg) versus high pressure (14 mmHg) CO2 insufflation on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Protocol,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-10, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0339161
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339161
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.