IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338998.html

Scaling up the global Green Bond market: Integrating global policy frameworks with stakeholder perceptions from Australia and the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Madurika Nanayakkara
  • Sisira Colombage

Abstract

The Green Bond (GB) market has not been as effective as anticipated in tackling the global climate change crisis. There is a substantive investment gap worldwide in meeting the financing needs of green projects. Thus, this study reviewed key publications of international market players from 2007 to 2021 to identify how key stakeholders perceive the GB market. We employed a qualitative research approach using document analysis. In addition to this, a number of interviews were conducted to validate the findings by providing suggestive and supportive evidence. The findings indicate structural constraints affecting both supply and demand dynamics in the GB market. This study contributes to the literature by integrating documentary evidence and stakeholder perspectives into a unified conceptual framework that explains the institutional and market barriers affecting the global scaling of Green Bond markets and identifies implications for future policy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Madurika Nanayakkara & Sisira Colombage, 2026. "Scaling up the global Green Bond market: Integrating global policy frameworks with stakeholder perceptions from Australia and the United Kingdom," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-27, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338998
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338998
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338998&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.