IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338929.html

Effects of aquatic exercise on arterial stiffness and endothelial function in adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Dunlap
  • Yanbing Zhou
  • Manny MY Kwok
  • Billy CL So
  • Hirofumi Tanaka

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of aquatic exercise compared with non-exercise controls and land-based exercise on arterial stiffness and endothelial function. Design: Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Data sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, SPORTDiscus, and reference lists, searched from database inception to April 16, 2025. Eligibility criteria: Studies evaluating chronic aquatic exercise (multi-session interventions) compared with land-based exercise or non-exercise comparison groups in adults, measuring arterial stiffness via pulse wave velocity (PWV) or endothelial function via flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Results: This review includes 18 randomized controlled trials with 845 participants (mean age 65 ± 7 years). Studies compared aquatic exercise with non-exercise controls (8 studies), land-based exercise (6 studies), or both (4 studies). Exercise sessions averaged 50 minutes, 3 times weekly for 11 weeks. Most studies (17 out of 18) implemented moderate-to-vigorous intensity protocols. Aquatic exercise resulted in improvements in arterial stiffness compared with non-exercise controls (7 studies; SMD = –2.37, 95% CI: –4.46 to –0.29; I2 = 98%: low certainty), with most evidence reflecting systemic and peripheral PWV. Changes in arterial stiffness did not differ from those observed after land-based exercise (6 studies; SMD = –0.07, 95% CI: –0.34 to 0.20; I2 = 0%, moderate certainty). For endothelial function, aquatic exercise may improve outcomes versus non-exercise controls (6 studies; SMD = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.43; I2 = 68%; low certainty) and may lead to greater improvements than land-based exercise (7 studies; SMD = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.05 to 1.06; I2 = 75%; low certainty). Conclusion: Aquatic exercise improves systemic and peripheral arterial stiffness as well as endothelial function compared with non-exercising controls. Changes in arterial stiffness do not differ from those observed after land-based exercise. Aquatic exercise may provide greater improvement in endothelial function than land-based exercise, though this is supported by low-certainty evidence, and substantial heterogeneity limits confidence in the generalizability of this finding. PROSPERO registration: CRD42025642087.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Dunlap & Yanbing Zhou & Manny MY Kwok & Billy CL So & Hirofumi Tanaka, 2025. "Effects of aquatic exercise on arterial stiffness and endothelial function in adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338929
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338929
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338929&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338929?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.