Author
Listed:
- Amanda Almeida Gomes Dantas
- Nayara Priscila Dantas de Oliveira
- Luís Felipe Leite Martins
- Marianna de Camargo Cancela
- Junior Smith Torres-Roman
- Dyego Leandro Bezerra de Souza
Abstract
Delayed access to colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment leads to disease progression, advanced stages at diagnosis, and reduced survival. In Brazil, Law 12.732/2012 mandates treatment initiation within 60 days of diagnosis; however, disparities persist. To assess compliance with the 60-day treatment initiation window for CRC in Brazil and its association with individual, socioeconomic, and healthcare system factors. We conducted a longitudinal observational retrospective cohort study using data from 65,582 CRC cases diagnosed between 2013 and 2019 in Brazil. Individual-level data were obtained from the Integrator of Hospital Cancer Registries, while socioeconomic and healthcare infrastructure data were extracted from national databases. A Multilevel Poisson Regression model with a random intercept was applied. Approximately forty-two percent of patients experienced treatment delays beyond 60 days, with significant variability among Federal Units (UFs). The highest delay rates were observed in Goiás (60.7%), Pará (60.6%), and Acre (58.4%). Factors associated with delayed treatment included younger age, non-white race, low educational level, rectal tumor location, referral through the Unified Health System (SUS), and receiving treatment outside the patient’s municipality of residence. Social determinants significantly impact CRC treatment delays in Brazil, highlighting the need to strengthen healthcare policies to ensure equitable and timely access to cancer treatment, ultimately improving patient survival.
Suggested Citation
Amanda Almeida Gomes Dantas & Nayara Priscila Dantas de Oliveira & Luís Felipe Leite Martins & Marianna de Camargo Cancela & Junior Smith Torres-Roman & Dyego Leandro Bezerra de Souza, 2026.
"Social determinants in the delay of starting colorectal cancer treatment,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-22, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0338727
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338727
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.