Author
Listed:
- Kengo Oka
- Saki Uemura
- Satoru Morishita
- Yukio Yamamoto
- Kei Kurita
Abstract
Background: Malocclusion is a common anomaly and is frequently observed in children and adults. Early detection and treatment of malocclusion is necessary to prevent and minimize complications. Therefore, developing a tool to check dentition at an early stage and motivate patients themselves to visit the dentist is required. Objective: This study aimed to examine the feasibility of building an AI model that can detect malocclusion in children during the mixed dentition stage. Methods: This study was conducted as a feasibility study using cross-sectional data. Subjects were recruited from panelists registered with Macromill, Inc. (approximately 1.3 million registered in 2021). A total of 519 elementary school children (275 boys and 244 girls in Grades 3–6) were included in this study. Questionnaire data and tooth alignment images of the children were collected. The dataset was created, and AI-based binary classification models for malocclusion were developed using an automated machine learning platform (DataRobot) to construct three algorithms for determining malocclusion (deep bite, maxillary protrusion, and crowding). Using a test dataset, the model’s performance was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, F1 score, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and area under the ROC curves (AUC). Results: Three dental images were used for all model building, and questionnaire data used all four questions about oral habits (Q1: mouth open during the day, Q2: sleep with mouth open, Q3: have difficulty eating hard foods, Q4: prefer soft foods) for the deep bite classification model, Q1 and Q3 for the maxillary protrusion classification model, and Q1 and Q4 for the crowding classification model. The maxillary protrusion and crowding classification models showed moderate accuracy (AUC > 0.70), and the deep bite classification model showed high accuracy (AUC > 0.90). The permutation importance showed that dental image was the highest contributing factor in each model. Furthermore, while questionnaire data on oral habits were not an important factor in determining deep bite, these questionnaire data were an important factor in determining maxillary protrusion and crowding. Also, statistical analysis of the association between malocclusion and these oral habits revealed a significant association between maxillary protrusion or crowding and the presence or absence of oral habits. Conclusion: For the detection of malocclusion in mixed dentition, AI-based binary classification models are a promising approach as a screening tool.
Suggested Citation
Kengo Oka & Saki Uemura & Satoru Morishita & Yukio Yamamoto & Kei Kurita, 2025.
"Accuracy of AI-based binary classification for detecting malocclusion in the mixed dentition stage,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-17, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0338713
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338713
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.