Author
Listed:
- Elham Shahidi Delshad
- Mohsen Soleimani
- Armin Zareiyan
- Ali Asghar Ghods
Abstract
Introduction: Innovative behavior is essential in nurses, driving continuous improvement and operational efficiency, significantly enhancing patient outcomes and overall healthcare quality. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of a specific, theory-driven inventory for measuring nurses’ innovative behavior in Iran. Materials and methods: A methodological study was conducted from November 2022 to April 2024. The conceptualization phase involved a qualitative study and a comprehensive literature review to define the concept of nurses’ innovative behavior and identify its key dimensions. The subsequent psychometric evaluation assessed face validity, content validity, construct validity, and structural validity (using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses) on a sample of 572 clinical nurses. Reliability was evaluated through internal consistency and the test-retest methods. Additionally, responsiveness and interpretability were examined according to the COSMIN checklist. Results: The construct validity of a five-factor structure (nurses’ competencies, idea validation, clinical idea implementation, promoting innovation, and generating care ideas), identified during the conceptualization phase, was confirmed. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded a χ2/df ratio of 1.88 for the NIBI five-factor structure. The goodness of fit indices indicated suitable values (CFI = 0.916, AGFI = 0.817, IFI = 0.917, PCFI = 0.709, and RMSEA = 0.057), with all factor loadings greater than 0.5 and statistically significant. Both convergent and divergent validities were demonstrated. The Cronbach’s alpha and omega coefficients ranged from 0.74 to 0.88 and 0.75 to 0.88, respectively. Additionally, the ICC for the entire inventory was 0.975 (CI 0.95–0.98, P
Suggested Citation
Elham Shahidi Delshad & Mohsen Soleimani & Armin Zareiyan & Ali Asghar Ghods, 2025.
"The Nurses’ Innovative Behavior Inventory (NIBI): A development and validation study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0338696
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338696
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.