IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338642.html

Optimizing expanded carrier screening for China: Multi-center study establishes 202-gene panel with optimal cost-effectiveness in preconception and prenatal care

Author

Listed:
  • Yulu Yang
  • Yuting Hang
  • WeiSheng Cheng
  • Yunxia Cao
  • Zhaolian Wei
  • Jing Yuan

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different expanded carrier screening (ECS) panels for couples in China during preconception and early pregnancy (≤12+6 weeks) based on a multi-center cohort study. Methods: A multicenter, population-based study was conducted across 22 prenatal diagnosis centers in China from August 2022 to June 2023, enrolling 2,996 participants. Geographical distribution and at-risk gene frequencies were analyzed, categorizing the 222-gene panel into three groups: Panel A (222 genes), Panel B (188 genes, compliant with international guidelines), and Panel C (202 genes, optimized for the Chinese population). Decision-tree models assessed cost-effectiveness in two clinical scenarios: Preconception and During Pregnancy. Additionally, two distinct outcomes were employed: payoff 1 was defined as the number of necessary medically termination, while payoff 2 was the number of newborns free of recessive monogenic disorders. Results: As anticipated, European screening recommendations demonstrated limited applicability to the Chinese population. Panel A incurred the highest total cost in both the Preconception (US $5,214) and During Pregnancy (US $990) models. In the Preconception model, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for Panel C was US $74,869 per necessary termination and US $23,999 per additional healthy newborn without genetic disorders, compared to Panel B. In the During Pregnancy model, Panel B was the most cost-effective, yielding savings of US $580 per necessary termination and US $2,052 per healthy newborn compared to Panel C. Conclusion: For Chinese couples, the 202-gene panel (Panel C) is the most cost-effective option in both preconception and prenatal settings. However, for couples prioritizing comprehensive screening over cost, the 222-gene panel (Panel A) provides greater clinical value at a higher cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulu Yang & Yuting Hang & WeiSheng Cheng & Yunxia Cao & Zhaolian Wei & Jing Yuan, 2026. "Optimizing expanded carrier screening for China: Multi-center study establishes 202-gene panel with optimal cost-effectiveness in preconception and prenatal care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338642
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338642
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338642&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338642?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.