IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338592.html

Placental lesions in stillbirths: A case-control study using the Amsterdam criteria and predictive models at a UK tertiary unit

Author

Listed:
  • Brenda F Narice
  • Victoria Byrne
  • Joanna Shepherd
  • Marta C Cohen
  • Dilly O Anumba

Abstract

Introduction: The UK stillbirth rate remains higher than in many high-income countries, with placental disorders -particularly maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) lesions -linked to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. This study examines placental lesions in stillbirth at one of the largest maternity units in the UK using the Amsterdam criteria for histological classification. It also retrospectively examines whether women with global/partial MVM – where most maternal decidual vessels show pathological changes but are only partially occluded- would have received aspirin and further surveillance if their placental dysfunction risk had been assessed using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm from the Tommy’s app in their first trimester. Materials and methods: We conducted a case-control study of spontaneous non-anomalous stillbirths (≥24 weeks) at Sheffield maternity unit from 2018 to 2021 (n = 83). We then compared singleton stillbirths at term with matched livebirths. Placental lesions were categorised with the Amsterdam criteria. Using the FMF’s algorithm which has only been recently introduced in our unit, we then retrospectively calculated the risk for placental dysfunction in women who experienced preterm PET stillbirth and also in those whose placentas showed global/partial MVM. Results: MVM was the most common placental lesion in stillbirths, significantly more frequent than in livebirths (p

Suggested Citation

  • Brenda F Narice & Victoria Byrne & Joanna Shepherd & Marta C Cohen & Dilly O Anumba, 2025. "Placental lesions in stillbirths: A case-control study using the Amsterdam criteria and predictive models at a UK tertiary unit," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338592
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338592
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338592&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338592?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.