IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338541.html

Analyzing public opinion on China’s “Double Reduction” policy: A sentiment and content analysis of microblog discourse

Author

Listed:
  • Shuhong Liu
  • Bo Feng

Abstract

The “Double reduction” policy in China was promulgated and implemented on July 24, 2021. This was the most rigorous and radical education reform since China was founded, aimed at easing pupils’ academic burden and improving their physical and mental health. It sparked extensive public debate across stakeholders (schools, teachers, parents). To delve into public sentiment and improve policy management, this paper analyzes Sina Weibo (Chinese Twitter) posts from July to November 2021. We apply text mining to collect microblogs and comments, and we use Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) for topic extraction. A natural language processing-based (NLP) approach is used to analyze the sentiment. Specifically, we fine-tune a pre-trained Chinese BERT model to classify sentiment, leveraging its superior performance on Weibo data. We report sentiment polarity (positive/negative/neutral) and track its trends over time. We also incorporate engagement metadata (likes/reposts) as indicators. Key findings include the distribution of sentiments, major public concerns, and how sentiment levels evolved around key dates. These insights can help policymakers understand public reactions and guide more responsive education reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuhong Liu & Bo Feng, 2026. "Analyzing public opinion on China’s “Double Reduction” policy: A sentiment and content analysis of microblog discourse," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338541
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338541
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338541&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338541?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.