IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338484.html

Prevalence and determinants of precancerous cervical lesions among women screened for cervical cancer in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Berihun Agegn Mengistie
  • Getie Mihret Aragaw
  • Tazeb Alemu Anteneh
  • Kindu Yinges Wondie
  • Alemneh Tadesse Kassie
  • Alemken Eyayu Abuhay
  • Wondimnew Mersha Biset
  • Gebrye Gizaw Mulatu
  • Nuhamin Tesfa Tsega

Abstract

Background: Precancerous cervical lesions, or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), represent a significant precursor to cervical cancer, posing a considerable threat to women’s health globally, particularly in developing countries. In Africa, the burden of premalignant cervical lesions is not well studied. Therefore, the main purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the overall prevalence of precancerous cervical lesions and identifying determinants among women who underwent cervical cancer screening in Africa. Methods: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Item Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (ID: CRD42025645427). We carried out a systematic and comprehensive search on electronic databases such as PubMed and Hinari. In addition, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect were utilized to find relevant studies related to precancerous cervical lesions. Data from the included studies were extracted using an Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using STATA version 17. The methodological quality of the eligible studies was examined using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) assessment tool. Publication bias was checked by using the funnel plot and Egger’s tests. A random-effects model using the Der Simonian Laird method was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of pre-cancerous cervical lesions in Africa. The I-squared and Cochrane Q statistics were used to assess the level of statistical heterogeneity among the included studies. Results: A total of 112 eligible articles conducted in Africa, encompassing 212,984 study participants, were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Thus, the pooled prevalence of pre-cancerous cervical lesions in Africa was 17.06% (95% confidence interval: 15.47%−18.68%). In this review, having no formal education (AOR = 4.07, 95% CI: 1.74, 9.53), being rural dweller(AOR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.64, 3.46), history of STIs (AOR = 3.94, 95% CI: 2.97, 5.23), history of having multiple partners (AOR = 2.73, 95% CI: 2.28, 3.28), early initiation of coitus (AOR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.11, 3.62), being HIV-seropositive women (AOR = 3.33, 95% CI: 2.32, 4.78), a CD4 count

Suggested Citation

  • Berihun Agegn Mengistie & Getie Mihret Aragaw & Tazeb Alemu Anteneh & Kindu Yinges Wondie & Alemneh Tadesse Kassie & Alemken Eyayu Abuhay & Wondimnew Mersha Biset & Gebrye Gizaw Mulatu & Nuhamin Tesfa, 2025. "Prevalence and determinants of precancerous cervical lesions among women screened for cervical cancer in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338484
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338484
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338484&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.