IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338374.html

Experiences of psychological mistreatment in older adults and promising practices: A scoping review protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Sabrina Lessard
  • Annie Bernatchez
  • Houda Garrach
  • Mélanie Couture
  • Claire Godard-Sebillotte
  • Sarita Israel
  • Rym Zakaria

Abstract

Objective: This project aims to gain a thoroughly understanding of the characteristics and experiences of psychological mistreatment among older adults, acknowledging the diversity within this population. It also seeks to identify clinical tools and practices for its detection and intervention. While there is extensive literature on mistreatment of older adults, specific studies focusing on psychological aspects and intersecting social and identity dimensions are scarce. The findings will provide valuable insights for policymakers and healthcare professionals, helping to shape interventions and policies aimed at countering mistreatment in the ageing population. Introduction: Psychological mistreatment involves a range of behaviors, expressions, and gestures—or the lack of appropriate actions—that negatively impact an individual's health and dignity. Often subtle and difficult to detect, this type of mistreatment is prevalent and can coexist with other types of abuse. Examination of psychological mistreatment, shaped by various social and identity dimensions, is lacking in current research, particularly regarding how it is experienced by older adults. This scoping review seeks to map the current knowledge on psychological mistreatment of older adults, while highlighting gaps and future directions for research. Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will encompass studies that explore the characteristics and experiences of psychological mistreatment among older adults, including their experiences and those of perpetrators and witnesses. It will also identify clinical tools and practices for the detection and intervention of psychological mistreatment in this population. Method: A scoping review will be undertaken by a multidisciplinary team, examining studies from post-2010, sourced from both bibliographic databases and grey literature, available in English or French. Employing an intersectional framework, the review will use Gender-Based Analysis Plus (GBA+) to examine how different forms of discrimination intersect and shape experiences of mistreatment. That is, this approach will help explore how social and identity dimensions—including gender, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and health conditions—shape the experiences and manifestations of psychological mistreatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabrina Lessard & Annie Bernatchez & Houda Garrach & Mélanie Couture & Claire Godard-Sebillotte & Sarita Israel & Rym Zakaria, 2025. "Experiences of psychological mistreatment in older adults and promising practices: A scoping review protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338374
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338374
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338374&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.