IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338318.html

Identifying and characterizing ideologically homogeneous clusters on Twitter and Parler during the 2020 election

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Verdear
  • Ashley Hemm
  • Zuoyu Tian
  • Sara El Oud
  • Sandra Kübler
  • John Funchion
  • Michelle Seelig
  • Amanda Diekman
  • Manohar Murthi
  • Kamal Premaratne
  • Neil F Johnson
  • Stefan Wuchty

Abstract

During the 2020 U.S. presidential election cycle, a combination of public statements and social media posts cast doubt on the legitimacy of the election. These sentiments flowed through various social networks and eventually sparked the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol. Here, we analyze both the network-level and content-level data that made the #StopTheSteal movement so effective online. We use Louvain clustering and a novel homogeneity metric to identify the most ideologically homogeneous groups within the discussion on the mainstream social network Twitter and alternative social network Parler. We show that these ideologically homogeneous groups spread messages further than their ideologically diverse counterparts. Our results also differentiate between ideologically homogeneous left- and right-leaning groups by measuring the characteristics of their texts, finding that right-leaning texts are stylistically similar to worldbuilding language that can be found in conspiracy theory texts.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Verdear & Ashley Hemm & Zuoyu Tian & Sara El Oud & Sandra Kübler & John Funchion & Michelle Seelig & Amanda Diekman & Manohar Murthi & Kamal Premaratne & Neil F Johnson & Stefan Wuchty, 2025. "Identifying and characterizing ideologically homogeneous clusters on Twitter and Parler during the 2020 election," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338318
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338318
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338318&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Abreu & Doh-Shin Jeon, 2019. "Homophily in Social Media and News Polarization," Working Papers 19-05, NET Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/27dls12b6d8aor7i6sipg9ie3g is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Leonardo Madio, 2023. "Content Moderation and Advertising in Social Media Platforms," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0297, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    3. Alexandre de Cornière & Miklos Sarvary, 2023. "Social Media and News: Content Bundling and News Quality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 162-178, January.
    4. Leonardo Madio & Martin Quinn, 2024. "Content Moderation and Advertising in Social Media Platforms," CESifo Working Paper Series 11169, CESifo.
    5. Emeric Henry & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya & Sergei Guriev, 2022. "Checking and Sharing Alt-Facts," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 55-86, August.
    6. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/27dls12b6d8aor7i6sipg9ie3g is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.