Author
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the Key Points (KP) and Key Shots (KS) in singles matches for elite table tennis players, enhancing the knowledge of winning patterns in table tennis. A total of 60 men’s singles and 64 women’s singles matches were analyzed, all data sourced from events such as the World Championships, World Cup, Olympic Games, and WTT Champions. Methods: Survival analysis was introduced, in which points scored in a match and shot counts in a rally were treated as “survival time,” while losing a point was defined as the “event.” The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to estimate cumulative survival probabilities, which reflect the likelihood of players enhancing their winning potential at specific scores or shot numbers. The point or shot number at which the cumulative survival probability drops to 50% is defined as the KP or KS, respectively. Additionally, the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) non-parametric test was applied to determine whether significant differences existed between the survival curves of different groups. Results: KP in table tennis singles demonstrate a stable pattern of “ 7 for women, 8 for men,” while Winning Points (WP) are predominantly concentrated at the 9th point. The KS positions are consistent in both men’s and women’s singles, specifically the 4th shot in the total rally, the 3rd shot in the serving round, and the 2nd shot in the receiving round. Winning Shots (WS) consistently occur at the 6th shot in the total rally, as well as the 3rd shot in both the serving and receiving rounds. Conclusion: These findings advance our understanding of winning patterns in table tennis, providing theoretical foundations and practical references for designing contextualized training programs, precisely regulating athletes’ competitive psychology, and optimizing future competition rules.
Suggested Citation
Muzi Li & Qing Yang, 2026.
"Exploring the key points and key shots in table tennis matches based on survival analysis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-15, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0338203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338203
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.