IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338199.html

Do ‘leaders’ in change sound different from ‘laggers’? The perceptual similarity of New Zealand English voices

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Sheard
  • Jen Hay
  • Joshua Wilson Black
  • Lynn Clark

Abstract

Work on covariation in New Zealand English has revealed groups of speakers characterised by their back vowel spaces and status as ‘leaders’ or ‘laggers’ across a set of ongoing vowel changes. We investigate whether listeners hear speakers from different groups as perceptually distinct. We conduct a perception task in which New Zealanders rate the similarity of pairs of speakers. We use the results to create a two-dimensional perceptual similarity space by means of Multi-Dimensional Scaling, and test if speakers are organised within this space according to their back vowels, leader-lagger status, speed, or mean pitch. Results indicate higher pitched and faster speakers are perceptually distinct from lower pitched and slower speakers. Leaders are perceptually distinct from laggers if they are not markedly higher pitched. A Generalised Additive Mixed Model fit to the trial-by-trial ratings shows order effects, revealing that perception of similarity is not symmetrical. They also support the perceptual relevance of speaker speed, pitch and leader-lagger status.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Sheard & Jen Hay & Joshua Wilson Black & Lynn Clark, 2025. "Do ‘leaders’ in change sound different from ‘laggers’? The perceptual similarity of New Zealand English voices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338199
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338199
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338199&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.