IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0337702.html

Establishing consensus on the implementation of Anticoagulation Stewardship Program with cardiologists in Pakistan: A Delphi study

Author

Listed:
  • Wajiha Razzaq
  • Muhammad Atif
  • Kanza Arshad
  • Imran Masood

Abstract

Background: The Anticoagulation Stewardship Program (ASP) improves clinical outcomes, promotes patient safety, and supports healthcare systems in delivering high-quality, evidence-based anticoagulation management. This study aimed to develop a consensus among cardiologists about the implementation of the ASP Program in Pakistan. Methods: A three-round Delphi study was conducted utilizing an online questionnaire. In Round 1, cardiologists (Delphi panel experts) reported their consensus with the items in the questionnaire using a 3-point Likert scale. The selection of items for Round 2 was based on acceptance by ≥66.6% of the cardiologists and the agreement of the scientific committee. In Round 2, the panelists assessed those items that failed to gain consensus in Round 1. In Round 3, a face-to-face meeting was conducted among the scientific committee to evaluate the items that failed to gain expert agreement in Round 2 to form the final consensus document. Descriptive statistics was used to present the data. Results: A total of 90 cardiologists from 30 hospitals were invited to participate in the study. Of these, 75 agreed to participate in Round 1 of the study (83% response rate). 68 cardiologists completed the survey in Round 2. Initially, 33 items from four domains were evaluated by the Delphi experts in Round 1. 18 items reached consensus in Round 1, 4 items reached consensus in Round 2, and 2 items reached consensus in Round 3. The final consensus document comprised 24 items. The study showed absolute consensus among national cardiologists regarding the implementation of ASP in Pakistan. A considerable agreement was achieved regarding essential components needed to strengthen ASP for anticoagulation management in the cardiology departments. Conclusion: This study emphasized the need for educational sessions for patients and healthcare professionals, collaboration with healthcare authorities, and allocation of financial resources for ASP. This study also identified consensus among cardiologists on the perceived benefits of ASP for patients and the healthcare system. Several barriers that hindered the implementation of ASP in Pakistan were identified, including patient- and healthcare system-related barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wajiha Razzaq & Muhammad Atif & Kanza Arshad & Imran Masood, 2025. "Establishing consensus on the implementation of Anticoagulation Stewardship Program with cardiologists in Pakistan: A Delphi study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337702
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337702
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337702&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0337702?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.