IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0337644.html

Complications and oncologic outcome in bladder cancer patients receiving radical cystectomy after intravesical instillation treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa J Frey
  • Katarzyna E Banasiewicz
  • Christian Ruckes
  • Isabel Wagner
  • Maximilian Haack
  • René Mager
  • Eva Juengel
  • Axel Haferkamp
  • Gregor Duwe
  • Maximilian P Brandt

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of previous intravesical treatment with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or mitomycin on postoperative complications and oncologic outcome in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients receiving radical cystectomy (RC). Patients and methods: Between 2016 and 2021, 366 patients who received RC for bladder cancer (BC) were screened. Patients with intravesical treatment with either BCG or mitomycin for NMIBC were compared to patients with BC without prior intravesical treatment. Patients were matched manually for ASA-score, BMI cluster, age, and sex. TNM stages were used as covariates in the analysis model. All complications within 30 days post-surgery and the 90-day mortality rates were analyzed. Patient characteristics were compared between groups using Chi2-tests, and associations were evaluated by logistic regression. Firth logistic regression was applied for comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and Cox regression analysis was performed to further assess survival outcomes. Results: We identified 51 matched patients receiving BCG or mitomycin for NMIBC. Nine women and 42 men were in the interventional group with a mean age of 70 and a BMI of 27.6. In both groups, ASA-score 2, 3, and 4 were present in 18, 29, and four patients. According to the Clavien–Dindo (CD) classification grade ≥ 3b, neither the incidence nor severity of complications differed significantly between groups. Final histopathology and survival outcomes (OS, PFS) were comparable. No associations were found between complications and urinary diversion or surgical approach. As expected, advanced T- and N-stages correlated with worse survival, while coronary artery disease (CAD) was significantly associated with postoperative complications. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first matched pair analysis that evaluates the impact of intravesical treatment on postoperative complications for patients with NMIBC receiving RC. Intravesical treatment with BCG or mitomycin did not deteriorate postoperative complications in NMIBC patients after RC, irrespective of the final histopathology stage. Oncologic outcomes were similar in both groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa J Frey & Katarzyna E Banasiewicz & Christian Ruckes & Isabel Wagner & Maximilian Haack & René Mager & Eva Juengel & Axel Haferkamp & Gregor Duwe & Maximilian P Brandt, 2025. "Complications and oncologic outcome in bladder cancer patients receiving radical cystectomy after intravesical instillation treatment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337644
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337644
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337644&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0337644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.