Author
Listed:
- María G Jean-Tron
- Juan Garduño-Espinosa
- Diana Ávila-Montiel
- Gina C Chapa-Koloffon
- Oscar A Resendez-Berber
- Elizabeth Cruz Cruz
- Guillermo Salinas-Escudero
- Onofre Muñoz-Hernández
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the moral intuitions of mothers and children aged 3–6 (n = 75). Methods: Five dilemmas were applied. The agreement between mother and child responses was evaluated, as were trends in agreement between girls and boys. Kappa statistics and Spearman’s correlation analyses were conducted. McNemar’s test was administered to assess the Double Effect Doctrine and the Contact Principle. Outcome: In general, children responded to moral dilemmas similarly to their mothers. However, no significant agreement was found between mothers and children when evaluating each dilemma. Although the children’s answer patterns were similar to those of their mothers, the presence of neither the Double Effect Doctrine nor the Contact Principle could be identified in children. Conclusions: While there are some similarities between preschoolers and their mothers when responding to moral dilemmas, the integration of deontological principles in the resolution of ethical dilemmas in the children studied has not been achieved. Mothers in the study use these principles, which support the previous related evidence.
Suggested Citation
María G Jean-Tron & Juan Garduño-Espinosa & Diana Ávila-Montiel & Gina C Chapa-Koloffon & Oscar A Resendez-Berber & Elizabeth Cruz Cruz & Guillermo Salinas-Escudero & Onofre Muñoz-Hernández, 2026.
"Early ethics: Exploring moral intuition and maternal Influence in preschool children,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-14, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0337474
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337474
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.