IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0337459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer a single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Li Yu
  • Xinlin Yu
  • Cheng Ma
  • Xialin Zhang
  • Ran Cui

Abstract

Background: Limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) has a poor prognosis despite being potentially curable with standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in extensive-stage SCLC has prompted investigation into combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy for LS-SCLC. This systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis aims to synthesize the evidence on this combined modality, providing pooled estimates of efficacy and safety to inform clinical practice and future trials. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through July 2025 for studies evaluating radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with LS-SCLC. The primary outcomes analyzed included pooled objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS). Results: Six studies, encompassing 487 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis demonstrated an ORR of 57.7% (95% CI: 24.9–90.5%), a weighted mPFS of 13.6 months (95% CI: 11.3–15.9 months), and a pooled mOS of 33.7 months (95% CI: 26.7–40.7 months). Grade 3−4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42.2% of patients. Subgroup analyses revealed that a concurrent treatment sequence yielded a significantly higher ORR compared to sequential approaches (77.6% vs. 65.2% for immunotherapy followed by radiation vs. 25.8% for radiation followed by immunotherapy). Radiation dose was also identified as a critical determinant of efficacy. Anti-PD-L1 agents showed a numerically higher ORR than anti-PD-1 agents (96.0% vs. 65.0%). Conclusion: The combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic strategy for LS-SCLC, demonstrating encouraging efficacy outcomes that appear favorable compared to historical benchmarks for chemoradiotherapy alone. Optimizing treatment sequencing, particularly favoring a concurrent approach, is crucial for maximizing clinical benefit. These findings support further investigation in randomized controlled trials to confirm the value of this combined modality and to identify predictive biomarkers for patient selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Yu & Xinlin Yu & Cheng Ma & Xialin Zhang & Ran Cui, 2025. "Safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer a single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337459
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337459
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337459&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0337459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.