Author
Listed:
- Woldeab Daniel Eka
- Tiruwork Tamiru Tola
- Reda Darge Negasi
Abstract
This study examined effects of Mathematics learning strategy and perceived-task-difficulty on their achievement. Post-positivism paradigm, quantitative approach and correlations design were employed. Out of 2893 total student population, 351 were sampled using systematic random sampling. Whilst learning strategy and perceived-difficulty were measured using questionnaire, Mathematics achievement was measured teacher-made tests. Pilot study was conducted on 140 samples and the result revealed that Cronbach alpha for both scales appeared above 0.7. The structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze the data. The path analysis indicated that 22% of variance in mathematics achievement was significantly explained by the joint effects of learning strategy and perceived task difficulty. The result also indicated that the standardized regression weights of (β = .186) and (β = −.374) for learning-strategy and perceived task-difficulty, respectively, were found statistically significant. In conclusion, the effect of Mathematics learning strategy and perceived task difficulty on students’ Mathematics achievement is significant, and positive actions on improving task difficulty and Mathematics learning strategy can enhance Math achievement. Hence, setting tasks with proper level of difficulty and assuring students’ implementation of learning strategy suitable to contents are essential for enhancing students’ achievement in Mathematics.
Suggested Citation
Woldeab Daniel Eka & Tiruwork Tamiru Tola & Reda Darge Negasi, 2025.
"Effects of students’ mathematics learning strategy and perceived task difficulty on their achievement of mathematics,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-19, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0337115
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337115
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.