IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0337072.html

Evaluation of hospital-acquired conditions reduction program in surgical procedures

Author

Listed:
  • Yunwei Gai

Abstract

Hospital-Acquired Conditions Reduction Program (HACRP) by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) penalizes hospitals in the worst quartile of performance for targeted hospital-acquired conditions (HAC). This study examines its impacts on two targeted conditions: surgical site infection (SSI) for abdominal hysterectomy and colon procedures. This paper used a quasi-experimental method of difference-in-differences (DID) to analyze the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) from January 2012 to September 2015. The DID models compared changes in the probability of SSI for the targeted and control procedures before and after HACRP implementation. The DID estimates could be interpreted as the impact of the program. All models controlled for patient and hospital characteristics. The DID estimates were insignificant, and the results were robust across various sensitivity analyses. Although the results suggest that HACRP had no direct impact on SSIs in the two targeted conditions, caution should be exercised when interpreting these conclusions. This study is exploratory, and future research is needed to address its limitations, including the low predictive value of administrative SSI codes and concerns regarding the comparability of the control group. Previous studies have proposed three areas to improve HACRP: better measurement design, improved communication and follow-up, and alternative penalty structure. Collecting more granular data and conducting in-person interviews in future studies could help validate the current findings and identify effective strategies for improving HACRP.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunwei Gai, 2025. "Evaluation of hospital-acquired conditions reduction program in surgical procedures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337072
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337072
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337072&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0337072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.