IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0337063.html

Assessment of soil quality in arid zones using principal component analysis and GIS-based modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed S Shokr
  • Mohamed E M Jalhoum
  • Ahmed S A Sayed
  • Mohammed Saeed
  • Nazih Y Rebouh
  • Elsayed Said Mohamed
  • Ibraheem A H Yousif
  • Hend H Abdelhameed

Abstract

Background: Assessing the quality of the soil is a crucial first step in agricultural management. A major obstacle to raising agricultural output, economic growth, and environmental health has been the decline in soil quality. One of the most often used metrics for evaluating soil quality is the soil quality index (SQI), which is frequently calculated using principal component analysis (PCA). Methodology: In this study, a soil quality index in the southwest of the Ismailia Governorate, Egypt, was evaluated and mapped using a geographical information system (GIS) and multivariate analysis. (PCA). Fifty- one soil samples were gathered for this purpose, and they were examined using established procedures. The dataset was broken down into new variables using principal component analysis (PCA) to avoid multi-collinearity. Relative weights (Wi) and soil indicators (Si) were then established and used to calculate SQI. The SQI comprises three quality zones. Results and discussion: The first zone has a very good quality index, accounting for about 65.66 (ha) of the entire area. Soils in this zone were defined by low salinity of the groundwater and adequate values of each soil attribute. The second zone, which makes up about 414.76 ha (67.5%) of the total area, is characterized by its good-quality soil. About 133.91 ha (21.8%) of the total land area is in the third zone, which is fair (bad quality). Low concentrations of soil organic matter (SOM), salinity, accessible nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and cation exchange capacity (CEC) had the greatest effects on the SQI of the studied location. Combining PCA and GIS enables a precise and efficient evaluation of the SQI. Conclusion: Decision-makers can identify regions with very good, good, and poor soil quality by examining the generated spatial distribution maps. Additionally, they can learn how each characteristic influences plant growth. In addition, The methodology outlined in this work can be readily replicated in similar situations in arid regions, enabling local authorities and decision-makers to make use of the quantitative results achieved to guarantee long-term development.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed S Shokr & Mohamed E M Jalhoum & Ahmed S A Sayed & Mohammed Saeed & Nazih Y Rebouh & Elsayed Said Mohamed & Ibraheem A H Yousif & Hend H Abdelhameed, 2025. "Assessment of soil quality in arid zones using principal component analysis and GIS-based modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337063
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337063&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0337063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo A. Olea, 1999. "Geostatistics for Engineers and Earth Scientists," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-1-4615-5001-3, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.