IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0336969.html

Validation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among the Iranian adult population: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Ghasempour
  • Hamid Sharif-Nia
  • Soheil Nouri
  • Seyedmohammad Mirhosseini
  • Ali Abbasi

Abstract

Background: Self-esteem refers to an individual’s overall sense of self-worth, which plays a crucial role in their well-being. One of the most commonly used instruments to measure this concept is the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), which has been translated and psychometrically validated in numerous cultures and languages to date. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the RSES in the Iranian adult population. Methods: This cross-sectional validation study was conducted following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines in Shahroud city, northeastern Iran. A total of 533 adults from this city who spoke Persian and were literate were included in the study using convenience sampling. After translating and culturally adapting the RSES in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, face and content validity were assessed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Additionally, construct validity was evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was also determined by calculating Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, McDonald’s omega coefficient, composite reliability (CR), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The face and content validity of all items were confirmed through both qualitative and quantitative methods. Based on the results of the exploratory factor analysis using polychoric correlations and robust weighted least squares (WLSMV) estimation, the Persian version of this scale consists of two factors: (1) Positive self-esteem and (2) Negative self-esteem, which account for 59.1% of the total variance of the scale. All goodness-of-fit indices in the confirmatory factor analysis also supported this model (CMIN/df = 2.29, RMSEA = .049, CFI = .981). These two factors showed acceptable internal consistency and stability, as evidenced by Cronbach’s alpha coefficients (.828 and .801), McDonald’s omega coefficients (.833 and .810), composite reliabilities (.820 and .796), and intraclass correlation coefficients (.838 and .875). Conclusion: The findings of the current study showed favorable psychometric properties of the Persian version of the RSES for measuring self-esteem in the Iranian adult population.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Ghasempour & Hamid Sharif-Nia & Soheil Nouri & Seyedmohammad Mirhosseini & Ali Abbasi, 2025. "Validation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among the Iranian adult population: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336969
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336969
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336969&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0336969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.