IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0336782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of MLP and LSTM neural networks for shale gas production prediction based on numerical simulation data

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoou Fei
  • Man Ye
  • Zhou Du
  • Haibin Miao

Abstract

Accurate prediction of shale gas production is essential for optimizing reservoir development and improving production efficiency. In this study, a numerical simulation model was first developed to systematically calculate daily shale gas production under various engineering parameter combinations, thereby establishing a comprehensive production prediction database. Two types of deep learning models—multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks—were then constructed to predict daily shale gas production. Comparisons with actual production data for three representative scenarios revealed that the MLP model achieved relative errors of 2.43%, 6.36%, and 4.16%, while the LSTM model achieved superior accuracy with relative errors of 0.42%, 1.1%, and 0.98%. The LSTM network’s gating mechanisms effectively captured the long-term dependencies in shale gas production data, making it more suitable for complex multi-scale dynamic modeling compared to the feedforward MLP. These results demonstrate the excellent generalization capability and engineering applicability of deep learning techniques, particularly LSTM networks, for enhancing shale gas production forecasting and supporting the efficient development of unconventional gas reservoirs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoou Fei & Man Ye & Zhou Du & Haibin Miao, 2025. "A comparative study of MLP and LSTM neural networks for shale gas production prediction based on numerical simulation data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336782
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336782
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336782&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0336782?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.