IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0336689.html

New infant formulas for healthy term infants: A randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicenter, non-inferiority design safety study

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen A Fleming
  • Stefanie Flunkert
  • Anne S Kvistgaard
  • James McGrath
  • David K Glover

Abstract

Objectives: Two infant formulas with unique combinations of 1,3-dioleoyl-2-palmitoyl-sn-glycerol sn2 palmitate, galactooligosaccharide, polydextrose, fructooligosaccharide, β-carotene, lutein, α-lactalbumin, osteopontin, and lactoferrin were evaluated for non-inferiority compared to a commercially available formula. Methods: In a randomized, controlled, parallel-arm, double-blind, multicenter, non-inferiority study, eligible infants were enrolled to receive an experimental (BBN-001 [Part 1; N = 129], BBN-102 [Part 2; N = 117]) formula or commercial formula (Brand; N = 143) for 120 days (Clinical Trials.gov NCT03331276). Infants were considered eligible if they were healthy, term (≥ 37 and ≤ 42 weeks of gestation), singleton newborns, with a birth weight of at least 2,500 g, and no more than 14 postnatal days-of-age. Anthropometric growth, formula intake, gastrointestinal tolerance, and adverse events were measured throughout the study, and fecal soap fatty acids were measured at the end. The primary endpoint was weight gain at the end of the trial, with treatment groups to be considered non-inferior if their weight gain was > −3 g/d compared to the control group. Results: Both experimental formulas were non-inferior to the Brand formula according to anthropometric outcomes. Formula intake, total adverse events, and stool frequency and consistency were similar to Brand formulas. Some measures of gassiness and fussiness improved in the experimental formulas (P

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen A Fleming & Stefanie Flunkert & Anne S Kvistgaard & James McGrath & David K Glover, 2025. "New infant formulas for healthy term infants: A randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicenter, non-inferiority design safety study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336689
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336689
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336689&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0336689?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.