IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0336662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Albumin-corrected anion gap as a predictor of 28-day mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A machine learning-based retrospective study

Author

Listed:
  • Qiudie Liu
  • Mengqi Zhang
  • Daoxin Wang

Abstract

Background: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) remains a critical condition associated with high mortality rates, prolonged hospitalization, and reduced quality of life despite advances in critical care. The albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG), an emerging biomarker reflecting acid-base disturbances, has been linked to poor outcomes in various critical illnesses. However, its prognostic value for mortality in ARDS patients remains unexplored. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from ARDS patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in the MIMIC-IV database. Patients were stratified into quartiles (Q1–Q4) based on ACAG levels. The association between ACAG and 28-day all-cause mortality was comprehensively evaluated using restricted cubic splines, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression. We employed the Boruta algorithm and LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression to identify key predictive factors. Six machine learning algorithms were used to develop predictive models, with performance assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: Higher ACAG levels were significantly associated with increased 28-day mortality risk in ARDS patients (P

Suggested Citation

  • Qiudie Liu & Mengqi Zhang & Daoxin Wang, 2025. "Albumin-corrected anion gap as a predictor of 28-day mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A machine learning-based retrospective study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336662
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336662
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336662&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0336662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.