Author
Listed:
- Jiakun Wang
- Yawei Li
- Xiaotong Guo
- Huiying Chen
Abstract
Background: The new media environment driven by digital intelligence technologies provides new opportunities for enterprise development, but also brings new challenges for enterprise crisis management and network public opinion information (referred as public opinion) guidance. Focusing on the contradictions between the complex diversity of crisis types and the limited governance resources, it is of great significance for enterprises to determine the best public opinion guidance strategy. Methods: Considering the dynamic complexity of public opinion derived from enterprise crisis, this paper innovatively proposed a decision-making model of enterprise public opinion under crisis differentiation based on differential game. Then, the balance strategy of each stakeholder and the guiding effect of public opinion were discussed under four decision scenarios. Finally, the optimal resources allocation ratio of different types of crises is determined under the constraints of governance resources, and the key parameters of public opinion guidance process are identified. Results: The results show that, under four decision scenarios, the dual-guidance strategy achieves the best public opinion guidance effect and Pareto-optimal outcome for the game system. The overall benefit is maximized when the optimal investment ratio for the four types of crises (Values-type, Product-type, Marketing-type, and Internal management-type) is 60:28:8.4:3.6. The subsidy coefficients of enterprise to netizens and media both significantly the guidance effect of public opinion, but compared with the former, it is more sensitive to the changes of the letter. Conclusions: Based on the research results, this paper provides targeted suggestions for enterprises crisis response and their sustainable development under the new media environment.
Suggested Citation
Jiakun Wang & Yawei Li & Xiaotong Guo & Huiying Chen, 2025.
"Research on enterprise network public opinion guiding decision-making considering crisis differentiation,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-23, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0336465
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336465
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.