Author
Listed:
- Martha Paynter
- Anja McLeod
- Clare Heggie
- Wendy V Norman
Abstract
Objective(s): Doulas provide non-clinical support to people in pregnancy, labour and delivery, and, increasingly, to abortion-seekers. Even in contexts of decriminalization and proactive policy efforts to enhance access, barriers to abortion persist, especially for patients experiencing intersecting forms of oppression. Abortion doulas may play a role in improving access. This qualitative study explores the potential involvement of doulas in abortion services from the perspective of abortion health professionals and clinic administrative staff. Study design: This is a qualitative study. Participants were asked about experiences with doulas and potential doula contributions to abortion services. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: We conducted two focus groups and five individual interviews for a total of 18 participants. Participants perceived challenges to incorporating doulas formally into the abortion clinic setting, although they saw the possibility for doula support before and after receipt of abortion services. Conclusion(s): Our findings suggest abortion health professionals and clinic administrative staff perceive roles for doulas largely external to the clinical setting, to provide support for equity-deserving groups. They have concerns about the presence of doulas in the clinic due to policies against support people and because of the unregulated, unstandardized nature of doula practice. Implications: This qualitative study addresses the potential for integration of doulas with abortion care from the perspective of abortion clinic health professional and administrative staff. To our knowledge, this is the first study on this topic in Canada.
Suggested Citation
Martha Paynter & Anja McLeod & Clare Heggie & Wendy V Norman, 2025.
"A qualitative study of abortion professionals’ perspectives on doula support,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0336290
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336290
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.