IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0336143.html

Empathy in undergraduate medical students: A multivariate cross-sectional study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiong Liu
  • Hong Duo
  • Yiwu Su
  • Cuijiao Tian

Abstract

Context: Investigate the impact of various factors on medical students’ empathy scores, and provide constructive ideological and political education strategies to enhance their empathy abilities. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 320 undergraduate medical students from Wuhan University, spanning three academic years. A web-based questionnaire assessed empathy, including the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student Version (JSE-S). Various factors, including grade, gender, medical major choice, urbanization level, clinical course participation, internship experience, number of romantic relationships, and experience of breakups, were examined for their influence on empathy scores. Results: There is a significant correlation between medical major selection, gender, and empathy scores. Furthermore, in binary logistic regression analysis, the influence of medical major selection on empathy scores surpasses that of the inherent variable, gender. Conclusions: This study indicates that medical major choice and gender are predictive factors of empathy ability among medical students. More large-sample studies or qualitative research should be conducted to explore the influencing factors of empathy ability in medical students, with the aim of further enhancing their empathy levels. Additionally, we found that students who initially did not choose a medical major and male students are groups with relatively lower empathy levels. Medical schools should focus on empathy education for these groups in future training programs, aiming to increase their interest in medicine and improve their empathy levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiong Liu & Hong Duo & Yiwu Su & Cuijiao Tian, 2025. "Empathy in undergraduate medical students: A multivariate cross-sectional study in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336143
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336143
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336143&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0336143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0336143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.