IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335986.html

Which demographic characteristics are associated with willingness to take part in recontact studies? A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Zara Kayani
  • Andrew Willis
  • Safoora Gharibzadeh
  • Kamlesh Khunti
  • Ash Routen

Abstract

Background: Lower rates of participation in research by ethnic minority groups and socioeconomically deprived populations has led to efforts to develop recruitment strategies which aim to address this imbalance. Little is known about participation in recontact studies (where existing research participants are recruited to further studies). Identifying factors which predict rates of participation and retention is crucial to ensure the benefits of diversified recruitment are realised upon study completion. Methods: This secondary data analysis utilised data from the Multi-Ethnic Lifestyle Study (MELS) which was a multi-centre study. Modified Poisson regression models were applied in Stata version 18.0 to examine differences in demographic characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, migration status, education, employment) between existing MELS participants who did and did not consent to be recontacted for future health research, (2) consent to link study data to their health records, (3) and consent to share research data with universities and the NHS. Results: A total of 6147 participants (mean age: 51.9 years, ± 17.12) were included in the analysis. Older age, higher education level (A levels or above compared to GCSEs) participants were more likely to consent to be recontacted, and to agree to link study data to their health records. South Asian participants were less likely to consent to recontact (PR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.71–0.88], p

Suggested Citation

  • Zara Kayani & Andrew Willis & Safoora Gharibzadeh & Kamlesh Khunti & Ash Routen, 2025. "Which demographic characteristics are associated with willingness to take part in recontact studies? A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335986
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335986
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335986&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335986?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.