IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved CRISPR/Cas9 off-target prediction with DNABERT and epigenetic features

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Kimata
  • Kenji Satou

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 is a powerful genome editing tool, but its clinical application is hindered by off-target effects. Accurate computational prediction of these unintended edits is crucial for ensuring the safety and efficacy of therapeutic applications. While various deep learning models have been developed, most are trained only on task-specific data, failing to leverage the vast knowledge embedded in entire genomes. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel approach that integrates DNABERT, a deep learning model pre-trained on the human genome, with epigenetic features (H3K4me3, H3K27ac, and ATAC-seq). We conducted a comprehensive benchmark of our model, DNABERT-Epi, against five state-of-the-art methods across seven distinct off-target datasets. Our results demonstrate that the pre-trained DNABERT-based models achieve competitive or even superior performance. Rigorous ablation studies quantitatively confirmed that both genomic pre-training and the integration of epigenetic features are critical factors that significantly enhance predictive accuracy. Furthermore, by applying advanced interpretability techniques (SHAP and Integrated Gradients), we identified the specific epigenetic marks and sequence-level patterns that influence the model’s predictions, offering insights into its decision-making process. This study is the first to establish the significant potential of a pre-trained DNA foundation model for CRISPR/Cas9 off-target prediction. Our findings underscore that leveraging both large-scale genomic knowledge and multi-modal data is a key strategy for advancing the development of safer genome editing tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Kimata & Kenji Satou, 2025. "Improved CRISPR/Cas9 off-target prediction with DNABERT and epigenetic features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335863
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335863
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335863&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.