Author
Listed:
- Hiroyuki Kuraoka
- Mitsuo Hinoue
- Chikamune Wada
- Shinji Miyake
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between flow state and autonomic nervous system activity indices in 18 healthy male participants using a mental arithmetic task (Uchida-Kraepelin [U-K] test)—known as a sensory rejection task. The experiment consisted of two sets, each comprising a 5-minute rest period, followed by a 15-minute task period with varying task conditions of self-paced, to be performed at own pace, and competitive, as per the instruction “Always do as many calculations as possible, aiming to exceed the preceding performance.” In the subjective assessment, the flow, time perception, subjective mental workload, and feelings of fatigue were evaluated. Autonomic nervous system activity indices were continuously monitored. The results indicate that the U-K test, which is a low-difficulty, monotonous task, failed to induce a flow state. Physiological responses to mental tasks showed an increased heart rate, suggesting a Pattern 1 response. The participants who entered a flow state, based on their flow and time perception scores, had a decreased heart rate immediately after the task, supporting the association between the flow state and Pattern 2 responses. Considering the relationship between flow and Pattern 2 responses, it is recommended to assess flow using multiple physiological markers, including blood pressure.
Suggested Citation
Hiroyuki Kuraoka & Mitsuo Hinoue & Chikamune Wada & Shinji Miyake, 2025.
"Flow state and autonomic response patterns during sensory rejection tasks using the Uchida-Kraepelin Test,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0335711
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335711
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.