IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335620.html

Machine learning models for risk prediction of age-related macular degeneration in Fujian eye study

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Li
  • Bin Wang
  • Xiangdong Luo
  • Mingqin Zhang
  • Qinrui Hu
  • Xiaoxin Li

Abstract

Objective: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a retinal disorder that significantly impairs vision. This study investigates various machine learning models for predicting AMD risk, laying the groundwork for further research using big data and determining the most effective predictive model. Methods: Utilizing data from 8211 records with 39 features from the Fujian Eye Study, a cross-sectional epidemiological investigation, several machine learning models were developed and assessed. The models included logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Data preprocessing, feature selection, and model training were all key components of the study. Results: After evaluating multiple models, the logistic regression model emerged as the most accurate, achieving a balanced accuracy of 0.6364. Among the predictive features, educational background had the highest influence on the model’s predictions, with an average SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) value of 0.8199. Other significant factors included outdoor time and left eye spherical equivalent (OSSE), with SHAP values of 0.6474 and 0.6377, respectively. Conclusion: This study confirms that logistic regression is the most effective machine learning model for predicting AMD risk, with educational background identified as the most critical risk factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Li & Bin Wang & Xiangdong Luo & Mingqin Zhang & Qinrui Hu & Xiaoxin Li, 2025. "Machine learning models for risk prediction of age-related macular degeneration in Fujian eye study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335620
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335620
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335620&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.