Author
Listed:
- Yun Lu
- Junli Yang
- Yuxing Yan
- Yue Chang
Abstract
Objectives: The current status of antimicrobial prescription knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) landscape regarding antimicrobial prescriptions among the physicians in southwestern China was evaluated in this study. The objective of this study was to pinpoint the weak areas in the physicians’ antimicrobial prescription KAP and provide targeted recommendations. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a multi-stage sampling method was adopted to select 192 primary care institutions from 9 prefecture-level administrative divisions in southwest China, and questionnaires were distributed to the physicians within these institutions. The KAP score of antimicrobial prescription among the physicians was calculated. Variables on the demographic characteristics of the physicians were also collected. For comparisons between groups on single-factor variables, t-tests or one-way analysis of variance, while multiple linear regression was utilized to further explore the influencing factors. Results: A total of 518 physicians were included in this study. The physicians’ average scores for antimicrobial prescription KAP were 3.98 ± 1.85 ( 80%, good level), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that work duration significantly influenced physicians’ antimicrobial prescription knowledge and attitude levels, whereas sex was the primary factor affecting their antimicrobial prescription attitude and practices levels (P
Suggested Citation
Yun Lu & Junli Yang & Yuxing Yan & Yue Chang, 2025.
"Antimicrobial prescription KAP among physicians in primary care institutions in Southwest China,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-19, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0335484
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335484
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.