IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335461.html

Report from MDE practice: An interview-based evaluation of model-driven engineering uses

Author

Listed:
  • Hessa Alfraihi
  • Kevin Lano

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the usability of Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) through interviews with fifteen practitioners from diverse roles (e.g., developers, researchers, architects) and domains, and with a range of expertise levels across academic and industrial software sectors, capturing in-depth perspectives on its practical application. Participants emphasized MDE’s benefits in enhancing project robustness, reliability, development speed, and system organization. However, they also identified challenges such as a steep learning curve, technological constraints, organizational resistance, and a shortage of skilled professionals. To address these issues, participants recommended simplifying tools and language, improving consistency and flexibility, enhancing integration with existing workflows, and raising awareness of MDE. These insights provide valuable guidance for improving MDE usability and encouraging broader MDE adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Hessa Alfraihi & Kevin Lano, 2025. "Report from MDE practice: An interview-based evaluation of model-driven engineering uses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-28, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335461
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335461
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335461&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.