IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335430.html

The influence of occupational stress and job satisfaction on burnout among healthcare workers in the UAE: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Yousef Aljawarneh
  • Ahmad Al-Bashaireh
  • Zainab Albikawi
  • Osama Alkouri
  • Nour Ali Alrida
  • Mohammad Abuadas
  • Alanoud Alobaidly
  • Mahrah Alyileili
  • Shayma Alyileili
  • Wadha Alyileili
  • Fatmah Alhefetti
  • Amna Alhefeiti
  • Abdulkareem Alshehri
  • Abdulhafith Alharbi
  • Omar Qaladi

Abstract

Background: Healthcare Workers (HCWs) frequently face high levels of occupational stress, job dissatisfaction, and burnout due to the demanding nature of their work. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), these challenges are further intensified by the rapid growth of the healthcare sector and increasing workloads, making it particularly critical to study these variables. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the influence of occupational stress and job satisfaction on burnout and to identify the key predictors of burnout among HCWs in the UAE. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 498 HCWs from hospitals and primary healthcare centers under Emirates Health Services/ Ministry of Health and Prevention. Data was collected using the Work Stress Questionnaire (WSQ), Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), and Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). Results: The mean level of occupational stress was moderate, with a mean of 34.68 (SD = 10.15). The most affected subscales were “work-to-leisure time interference” and “influence at work.” The level of job satisfaction was also moderate, with a mean of 3.13 (SD = 0.75), and the highest satisfaction was related to extrinsic factors. The levels of burnout were notably high for emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, whereas “personal accomplishment” was less affected. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed significant predictors of emotional exhaustion (R2 = 0.530), including individual demands, work-to-leisure conflict, job satisfaction, income, and marital status. Depersonalization was predicted by indistinct organization, income, and employment type (R2 = 0.254). The least affected personal accomplishment subscale was predicted by occupational stress, age, education, nationality, and working hours, accounting for 6.9% of the variance (R2 = 0.069). Conclusion: The present study has highlighted the urgent need for targeted interventions to reduce occupational stress and improve job satisfaction to combat burnout among HCWs in the UAE. Organizational strategies should focus on workload management, promoting a healthy work-life balance, and clearly defining roles. These findings offer a foundation for informed policy actions to safeguard HCW well-being and elevate healthcare quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Yousef Aljawarneh & Ahmad Al-Bashaireh & Zainab Albikawi & Osama Alkouri & Nour Ali Alrida & Mohammad Abuadas & Alanoud Alobaidly & Mahrah Alyileili & Shayma Alyileili & Wadha Alyileili & Fatmah Alhef, 2025. "The influence of occupational stress and job satisfaction on burnout among healthcare workers in the UAE: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335430
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335430
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335430&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.