IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335390.html

U.S. trends of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor use from 2017–2023: An analysis of medicare, medicaid, and commercial insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Kiran Malhotra
  • Joseph Colcombe
  • Sachi Patil
  • Daniel Vail
  • Ravi Parikh

Abstract

Purpose: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medications are a cornerstone in the treatment of many macular diseases in modern ophthalmology. These medications accrue significant economic burdens to individuals and health systems, and recent data on health-system level practice patterns involving agent selection is lacking. We sought to examine utilization of intravitreal anti–VEGF agents from 2017 to 2023 across various payors and diagnoses in the United States in order to analyze trends in usage. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed. Data were obtained from the Epic Cosmos database, comprised of de-identified data from the electronic health record, Epic, of 238 million patients from all 50 states from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2023. Encounters where a patient received an intravitreal injection in an ophthalmology clinic were categorized by intravitreal medication ordered, visit diagnosis, and primary insurance payor. The overall usage rates of each medication across different diagnoses and primary payor were compared. Total number of injections per year of anti-VEGF medication, the rate per 100000 ophthalmology encounters (OE), and the rate in different retinal conditions and with various insurance providers were the main outcome measures. Results: From 2017–2023, there were 571,545 anti-VEGF injections administered, with 53.6% aflibercept 2 mg (306,247/571,545; 625.8/000 OE), 34.8% bevacizumab 1.25 mg (198,696/571,545; 414.7/100000 OE), 7.83% ranibizumab 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg (44,803/571,545; 99.2/100000 OE), and 3.43% faricimab 6 mg (19,624/571,545; 32.8/100000 OE). Brolucizumab 6 mg, ranibizumab-eqrn 0.5 mg, ranibizumab-nuna 0.5 mg, and aflibercept 8 mg accounted for 0.05] patients. Medicaid patients had a marginally significant difference in use of bevacizumab (M = 19.9/100000 OE, SD = 7.32) and aflibercept 2 mg (16.1/100000 OE, SD = 7.22) [t(6)]=2.95, p = 0.026]. Conclusions: Aflibercept 2 mg was the most common drug used overall from 2017–2023. Faricimab had the highest absolute and relative increase in utilization from 2022–2023. Patients with Medicare B or C were significantly more likely to receive aflibercept over bevacizumab.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiran Malhotra & Joseph Colcombe & Sachi Patil & Daniel Vail & Ravi Parikh, 2026. "U.S. trends of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor use from 2017–2023: An analysis of medicare, medicaid, and commercial insurance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335390
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335390
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335390&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.