IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335196.html

Assessing health and social care needs of chronic patients in rural areas: Protocol for the CAMP mixed-methods observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Angelo Cianciulli
  • Emanuela Santoro
  • Roberta Manente
  • Antonietta Pacifico
  • Marika Finizio
  • Nicole Bruno
  • Maria Costantino
  • Mario Capunzo
  • Giovanni Boccia

Abstract

Chronic diseases remain one of the most pressing public health challenges in Europe, disproportionately affecting older adults and residents of rural and underserved areas. Structural barriers to healthcare access, insufficient social support networks, and fragmented service delivery models amplify health disparities in these communities. In response, proximity-based and integrated care models have emerged as promising strategies, especially under national initiatives such as Italy’s National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR). The CAMP (Chronic health Assessment and Mapping of Proximity needs) study is a cross-sectional, observational, non-interventional protocol designed to identify and characterize the unmet health and social care needs of adults living with chronic conditions in rural areas of Southern Italy. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study integrates standardized quantitative tools—the SF-36, EQ-5D, Barthel Index, and MSPSS—with semi-structured interviews to assess quality of life, functional autonomy, access barriers, and perceived social support. The study population includes adults aged ≥18 years with at least one chronic condition, recruited through general practitioners and social services. Descriptive and multivariate analyses will be used to explore associations between clinical and social variables, while thematic analysis will be applied to qualitative data. Expected outcomes include a comprehensive mapping of service gaps and resource distribution, as well as feasibility assessments for implementing community hospitals and telemedicine models. The findings will inform evidence-based territorial health planning and contribute to shaping more equitable and integrated care strategies for vulnerable populations. This protocol was preregistered on the Open Science Framework on May 26, 2025 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YHD87).

Suggested Citation

  • Angelo Cianciulli & Emanuela Santoro & Roberta Manente & Antonietta Pacifico & Marika Finizio & Nicole Bruno & Maria Costantino & Mario Capunzo & Giovanni Boccia, 2025. "Assessing health and social care needs of chronic patients in rural areas: Protocol for the CAMP mixed-methods observational study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-7, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335196
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335196
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335196&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viktoria Szenkurök & Daniela Weber & Marcel Bilger, 2025. "Informal and formal long-term care utilization and unmet needs in Europe: examining socioeconomic disparities and the role of social policies for older adults," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 87-106, March.
    2. Ivan Maslyankov & Mónica Hernández, 2024. "The prevalence and determinants of unmet healthcare needs in Bulgaria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.