IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335143.html

Analysis of categorical data from biological experiments with logistic regression and CMH tests

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca J Androwski
  • Tatiana Popovitchenko
  • Anna J Smart
  • Sho Ogino
  • Guoqiang Wang
  • Mark Saba
  • Christopher Rongo
  • Monica Driscoll
  • Jason Roy

Abstract

The choice of appropriate statistical tests in experimental biology is critical for scientific rigor and can be challenging in the case of categorical data analysis. Using example datasets from Caenorhabditis elegans research, we conduct statistical analysis of (1) a rare cellular event involving the formation of a neuronal extrusion called an exopher and (2) a variable behavioral response across time. We employ the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel (CMH) test and logistic regression for analysis. Recognizing there are potential accessibility issues using logistic regression, we provide step-by-step tutorials and example code. We emphasize that logistic regression can handle both simple and complex multivariable datasets; logistic regression can also provide more comprehensive insights into experimental outcomes when compared to simpler tests like CMH. By analyzing real biological examples and demonstrating their analysis with R code, we provide a practical guide for biologists to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of categorical data analysis in experimental studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca J Androwski & Tatiana Popovitchenko & Anna J Smart & Sho Ogino & Guoqiang Wang & Mark Saba & Christopher Rongo & Monica Driscoll & Jason Roy, 2025. "Analysis of categorical data from biological experiments with logistic regression and CMH tests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335143
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335143
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335143&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.