Author
Listed:
- Sarah Ahmed A AlBassam
- Dhafir N AlShahrani
Abstract
Flight delays pose substantial operational and economic challenges for airlines, directly affecting scheduling efficiency, resource allocation, and passenger satisfaction. Accurate prediction of arrival delays is therefore critical for optimizing airline operations and enhancing customer experience. This study systematically evaluates the predictive performance of six machine learning classifiers—Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Naive Bayes—on a comprehensive flight dataset, with particular attention to the challenges posed by class imbalance. To mitigate skewed class distributions, resampling techniques including Random Oversampling, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), and Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN) were applied to the training data. Model performance was rigorously assessed using stratified 10-fold cross-validation and further validated on a hold-out test set, employing multiple evaluation metrics: Accuracy, F1-score, Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and ROC-AUC. The results demonstrate that Random Forest combined with Random Oversampling and Decision Tree combined with SMOTE both achieved the highest predictive performance (accuracy 0.90, F1-score 0.90, MCC 0.73, ROC-AUC 0.87. Notably, simpler models such as Naive Bayes exhibited competitive results under balanced conditions, underscoring the continued relevance of probabilistic classifiers in certain operational contexts. These findings highlight the critical role of resampling strategies and rigorous cross-validation in developing reliable, high-performing predictive models for imbalanced flight delay datasets, offering actionable insights for both airline operations and data-driven decision-making.
Suggested Citation
Sarah Ahmed A AlBassam & Dhafir N AlShahrani, 2025.
"Flight delay prediction: Evaluating machine learning algorithms for enhanced accuracy,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-17, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0335141
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335141
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.