IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixed methods study protocol evaluating early screening, triaging, risk assessment and health optimisation in perioperative pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Katie Gilchrist
  • Bo Hou
  • James Bedford
  • Patrick Nyikavaranda
  • Margaret Ogden
  • Grainne Brady
  • Angus I G Ramsay
  • Ramani Moonesinghe
  • Snehal M Pinto Pereira
  • Cecilia Vindrola-Padros

Abstract

Background: Over 10 million operations are carried out every year in the UK, improving millions of lives. While most operations are low-risk, some result in patients having poor outcomes. Preoperative assessment evaluates a patient’s health prior to surgery to identify risks and where possible minimise them through optimisation. However, this preoperative assessment often takes place close to the planned date of surgery, meaning there is little time to optimise patients’ health. Early preoperative screening is the process of evaluating a patient’s health earlier in the surgical pathway. In 2023, NHS England introduced a new programme where all hospitals were to implement early screening, triaging, risk assessment and health optimisation with the aim of increasing safety through reduced perioperative complications, increased efficiency (e.g., through reductions in last-minute cancellations), reductions in length of hospital stay, and identifying people who can undergo surgery without requiring an overnight stay. Here we describe the protocol to examine the implementation and impact of this new programme. Methods: A mixed methods research design will be used to evaluate this new programme. We will conduct a formative implementation evaluation using rapid qualitative methods consisting of interviews with staff members and patients across three broadly representative specialities (colorectal cancer surgery, repair of abdominal aorta and knee replacement) and observations of key meetings held regarding implementation activities. An interrupted time series analysis will address patient centered outcomes (days alive and out of hospital at 30, 180 and 365 days after surgery; postoperative hospital length of stay; emergency re-admission within 30 days) using routinely collected electronic health records. Discussion: This study will provide lessons on the barriers and facilitators to implementation and will highlight staff and patient experiences of the new programme. It will also assess impact on patient centred outcomes using routinely collected hospital data and quasi-experimental research methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Katie Gilchrist & Bo Hou & James Bedford & Patrick Nyikavaranda & Margaret Ogden & Grainne Brady & Angus I G Ramsay & Ramani Moonesinghe & Snehal M Pinto Pereira & Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, 2025. "A mixed methods study protocol evaluating early screening, triaging, risk assessment and health optimisation in perioperative pathways," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335129
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335129
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335129&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.